Secure on-line purchases by Major Credit Cards now available!

You are visitor number
 
213277
 
since 7/16/2005.

 
 Spread the word,
 click here.
 

      

WELCOME to 

the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER 

Testimonials page

This page will be dedicated to those who have been successful in their use of the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER system, as well as to those who have not.

Many websites try to sucker you into buying their product by offering up as proof of their products effectiveness, a plethora of phony testimonials they have either wrote, or edited themselves. We feel you are smart enough to decide for yourself if our testimonials are indeed genuine. We do however wish to respect the privacy of our readers by removing the hyperlinks from their email address and obscuring the identity of their last name. Otherwise, the emails are exactly as received. If you have used the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER system to fight your ticket (successfully or not), we would like to hear from you.

Kenneth Waters

 

The following was posted on the Georgia Sport Bike Forum March 21st  2006

http://www.georgiasportbike.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27695&highlight=Beez

Beez

I fell! I fractured! I slowly conquered the track!

 

 

Name Laura

Last Online: Today 02:24 PM

Join Date: May 2005

Location: Newnan, GA

Bike(s): SV650

Age: 28

Posts: 802
Bike Parts: 1,090
Bank: 0
Total Bike Parts: 1,090
Donate

Beez - 1 / City of East Point - 0 (Thanks James Jameson)

WOOHOO!!!!!

I just got back from court! I had a bench trial. I was very nervous. Thanks to Kenneth and his CD from his website, I stuck it too them.

http://www.thegeorgiaspeedingticketkiller.com/home.php

It was a HUGE HELP!

How things went....
I got to court at 9. My time was at 10. Well, the officer showed up and the judge told me that the officer would be the state and that she would remain impartial as the judge since the prosecutor was called away.

So then at about 10ish she calls me up. I ask to tape record. She allows it. She wants anyone who is testifying to raise their hand. I was not testifying so I did not.
Then the officer went to plead his case and well he got the venue then he messed up! Hahaha sucker!
When he stated my speed I objected and well that is when things started to go well.
Then the officer finished I asked to dismiss based on all the key things Kenneth had on the CD and then she said she would be right back.
She came back said she found in my favor, and the courtroom was all excited and said they wanted me as their lawyer! HAHAHAHA.....
Then we walked out and the court bailiff (the guy there to keep the peace) was so amazed he came out and told the guy who was doing the metal detector about how I ripped this officer a new one and that I was asking for certificates of this and that and even he didn't know what they were.

It was an awesome feeling winning!!!

THANKS AGAIN KENNETH!


 
 

BlueLghtning

Super Moderator

 

 

Name: Dan

Last Online: Today 07:33 PM

Join Date: Oct 2004

Location: Newnan, GA

Bike(s): FZ1, SV650s, KTM 300

Age: 30

Posts: 5,527
Bike Parts: 89,999,999,999,999,970,000,000,000
Bank: 10,403,999,999,999,996,000,000,000
Total Bike Parts: 100,403,999,999,999,960,000,000,000
Donate

Re: Thanks James Jameson

I went there to watch and it was awesome to see victory in the court room. Trust me, we were both prepared to see Beez walked over by the City of East Point in another Kangaroo Kourt as Ken calls them, but Beez did exactly what she needed and won here case.

If you don't think speeding tickets are anything but a way for the cities and counties to make money, go sit through  a couple court days. I was absolutely blown away at what a scam these courts are. I'm not justifying speeding by any means, but everyone who drives Atlanta freeways knows the 55mph speed limit is a joke anywhere within this city and is only enforced to make money.

Beez's case actually took 3 court appearances which kind of sucked, but it showed us once again what a joke it was. Her 1st court appearance was her arraignment where she pled not guilty. Then she was scheduled for what turned out to be a pre-trial where the prosecutor was willing to knock hers down to 14 and under which doesn't show up on your MVR, but they still get their full fine. They are hoping at this stage that people just take the plea bargain and not want to take another day off of work. (See the pattern). The cop wasn't there for that day which he should have been at a regular bench trial. They scheduled a bench trial once she rejected the plea bargain and of course made sure the cop could be there to testify. That took her to today which of course was the bench trial. The officer had 8 cases to testify against today, so they make it easy for them to knock them all out and 1 day.

She was the 1st case called at 10am. I was a little worried when there wasn't a prosecutor present as technically, I believe this isn't legal either in the City of East Point Municipal Court and puts the judge in a very precarious position to remain impartial. None the less, the officer presented his own case acting as the prosecutor for the state and the witness. (See where all this falls to being very edgy on the form of legality, but they do it regardless). I was so glad she was allowed to record it as that gives her an extra an edge since the judge knows it’s being taped.

She let the officer present his case which was a Laser case against Beez. Following all the advice given on the CD to fight a laser case, she was able to focus on some key points. She objected exactly when she needed to. She presented a few pieces of info the cop failed to present, then she allowed him to rest his case and she continued nailing him to the wall with a bunch of other things he failed to introduce into evidence. (Keep in mind you really only need 1 thing to get your case dismissed, but she had a list of things that he failed to enter into evidence). After she was done, the judge sat there for a minute, then said she had to take a small break, and was gone out of the court room for about 5 minutes. The court room went wild after the judge left as Beez said. I think they were all amazed including the bailiff. The cop testifying against Beez just put his head down on the witness stand and waited for the judge to return. He knew he had been beat! The judge came back and said case dismissed.

By the way, her fine would have been $415 had she been found guilty.

----- Original Message -----

From: Jason W…..
To:
the Georgia $peeding TICKET KILLER
Sent:
Thursday, April 20, 2006 4:37 PM
Subject:
Re: Trial the day after tomorrow-- April 20

Hi Kenneth,

I just got out of court. I did not have to go to trial (but I think I would have done well even if I had). The judge came in and said that the solicitor would talk to us individually to determine if a deal could be worked out in our various cases. She said that we didn't have to talk to him if we didn't want to, and that by talking to him we weren't foregoing the right to trial. There were about 20-30 people there, and I was the very last to be called, so I got a pretty good idea of how the game works by listening in on the conversations. Every person there took the deal he offered. A lady who had been charged with the same offense as me agreed to plead "no contest" for 0 points and no fine. When it came my turn, he asked me why I was taking the case to court. I responded that 1) The officer's position was behind me, so it makes it more difficult to determine whether I was moving or not (since the only clue is whether the car appears to get smaller). 2) It was at night, meaning that all the officer could see of my car were two points of light ( my brake lights) 3) I go through that intersection every day, and I had seen the police there the day before and knew to be on my best driving behavior 4) The officer COULD have used other, mechanical means to verify his judgment (video, RADAR, etc.) He responded that the police can't just go around video-taping the public, but I countered that they do it 24 hrs a day in downtown Athens (He just said "well, that's true").

After listening to all this, he offered me "no contest" and 0 points and no fine. I told him I understood that I could only plead no contest once every five years (thanks to you) and that I would like to reserve that for later. I said I might be willing to plead guilty to a lesser offense for no points and no fine. He said he frequently does allow this but that he always insists that the fine be paid. I said I couldn't take the deal and then he says "Well, you're an effective arguer, and I think you'd make a tough case, so I'll agree to let you plead guilty to 'too fast for conditions' with no fine and no points."  So there it is, I beat my ticket with no points, no fine, and I keep my ability to plead "no contest." And based on what I learned, I will NEVER just mail in a traffic fine again, especially in Athens-Clarke County. If I had gone to trial, I would have used your suggested defense (with additional cross about the position of observation and conditions that night), and I think I would have done well with it.

Thanks a lot!

--Jason

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Eric M.
To:
James Jameson
Sent:
Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:00 PM
Subject:
Re: Cop might not show?

As I sat there during a break, a woman approached me and told me she was a court reporter and that I can hire her if I desire. I told her that I brought a tape recorder and that I didn't need her services. She had this strange look on her face after I told her that and she said that there was no way that the judge would allow it.

When the judge returned from her break, she called me up to the stand and asked me if someone approached me about tape recording the trial and asked if I was going to try to record it. I told her that I brought a tape recorder and would like to record my trial.

She told me that there was no way that she was going to let me record it. So I told her that I brought two case laws and would like for her to review them. She said that she will look at them, but that she will not let me use the recorder. So I gave her the cases and sat back down.

During the next case and yes I do mean during (because she read it while the case was going on) she asked if I was taping that case. I told her that I was not and she said that she will tell me when I can turn the recorder on.

When the trial ended (it was a guy who was stopped for speeding in a school zone) the judge said that it was getting late and that the prosecutors should cut any deals they could. She made a reference to one police officer being present and two cases left to try. When she stepped out to take her break one of the prosecutors approached me and said that the police officer was not present and that they would lower my charge to some kind of moving violation which would mean no points.

I felt offended because I had sat there all afternoon and I know that they were trying to contact the police officer. I told them that I took an entire day off work and didn't feel that that was fair and that I shouldn't have to be charged with anything. I told them that I could have even been with my kids at camp instead of sitting in court all day. The other prosecutor turned around and said that he will dismiss the case and that I could leave.

When the prosecutor initially called me up (in hopes of cutting a deal), he said something like "the fine is $140, what do you want to do about this" or "how can this be resolved?" I got mad and told him that 3 police officers pulled me and my 11 yr. old son over, what are you going to do about this? The judge walked in before he could answer and he told me to sit down. He was the prosecutor who ultimately dismissed the case. The other prosecutor said that I was lucky because he would not have dismissed it. You know that made me so mad. I wanted to tell him what I thought about him and this traffic court system. It would not have been nice, but something told me to just leave.

You were right. The whole system is a scam. It is a cash cow, a money making machine. Everyone who gets a ticket should at least go to trial. You have nothing to lose. The defendant's who lost paid the same amount that they would have paid in the first place. At least they tried. You were absolutely right about everything and it is a crying shame that they get away with it everyday. For some reason I still don't have closure. The ticket was issued on March 5th and yesterday was May 31st. The important thing is that it was not time wasted. I learned a great deal and I am very grateful to you.

I then left. For some reason I feel like I should not have left without seeing the judge. I really don't trust them. I had my father there to witness everything that was said, but I feel like I should have had the judge sign off on the dismissal. I told my father that I should go back up there and try to get something official, but he said that I should not try to rub their faces in it.

Thanks for everything once again. I would like to purchase your book, but you have to autograph it for me.

God Bless You,
Eric

 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Noah M"
To: speedingticketkiller@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 1:12 AM
Subject: Free Analysis

Hi,

I've been reading your site with interest over the past couple weeks after I got a ticket from GA State Patrol in Morgan Co., Ga., a couple months ago. I've attached a scan of my ticket as requested, but the original sort of faded over time, so I'll try to translate what I can.

I would really appreciate if you could help me out with this one. Your system looks really good -- I paid for another guy's system, which doesn't even seem to apply (for the most part) in Ga., and I think I’ve learned more just from the free part of your site than all of his.
 
Keep up the good work fighting these crooks -- especially the ones after me! ;-)

Thanks a lot,

Noah
 

----- Original Message -----

From: Audrey B.
To:
the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER
Sent:
Monday, September 05, 2005 8:27 PM
Subject:
Re: Red Light Cameras

I work in the Rome area and there are a few criminal defense attorneys there that really do their job with gusto!!  They love to knock the prosecutors on their butts in court.  A couple of the judges up this way are really fair.  They really do try and give the defendants a chance.

The grave yard case really had some lazy work done by the prosecutors and their detectives and the criminal defense attorneys really knocked their socks off!! The Marietta Traffic Court is bad as well. Thanks for the information on your site and I'll keep passing it on to the attorney's that I do know that do care and will use some of this information.

Yours truly,

Audrey B
Paralegal

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Mike D.
To:
James Jameson
Sent:
Friday, October 07, 2005 3:49 PM
Subject:
Re: Any Questions?

Ken,

My girlfriend is the one that got this ticket. She is at court now. The officer is not there and it doesn't look like he is going to show since it is almost 4 now?

While she was there, the solicitor came up to her and asked it they would reduce it to 14 mph would she pay. She said she was not speeding and did not take it. They came back and asked her if she would take lower, and again, she said no. Sounds like they are frantic, like you said.

She did say that they were frantic and were trying to figure out what tactic she was going to use in her defense. They had no idea. She said the judge was spouting off things like, "I've seen it all, from trying to say that it was the car behind you going faster than you" and the one that blew me away was, "I have lasered an F14 going by so I know the laser works." That one was funny. The judge had no idea what she was going to do. They kept looking at the ticket trying to figure it out.

Another thing they said was, "are you getting some hot shot lawyer to work this for you". These are all scare tactics they were using to freak her out. I know if the officer didn't show then the system doesn't work at all. If it did, he would have been there.

Anyway, if you have any questions about what else happened, let me know and I will get her to send the answers to you.

Thanks again for all the help. I think you have an excellent thing here with the help you give other people. I would have never known how kangarooish the courts were without seeing it for my own eyes and knowing what you have been able to teach me. I also wish the courts were not as messed up.

I will be in touch. And no, she will not be getting any more tickets because she doesn't want to deal with that again.

Later,
Mike
 

 ----- Original Message -----

From: Sam S.
To:
'the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER'
Sent:
Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:40 PM
Subject:
Case Dismissed

Just wanted to let you know.  Case Dismissed!

There was no Prosecutor, just the Judge and the Officer Lowe.  I didn't even get the name of the Judge, but he was really fair and nice.  In a short pre-trial, I told the officer I wasn't going to challenge any of the technical data on the Citation, but that I was going to object based on lack of foundation. 

They allowed me to tape with no questions asked about that.  I am glad I don't have to use it, because it didn't pick up very well.  Anyhow, the officer basically outlined the Citation, and stated that it showed me entering the intersection on a red light.  Then I objected based on lack of foundation.  Then the Judge just asked me to go over my points. 

I talked about the section D(iii) in the code and how it stipulates Name only, and how the Citation stipulates name and address, and then I simply said that the wording in the Citation had the effect of intimidation on a defendant who might not want to place blame and financial obligation on a family member or close personal friend.  I had to go back and forth over it several times to make my point clear that a defendant might feel intimidated. 

The Judge attempted to try to get me to compare that analogy to a more serious crime, and would I not be willing to give a name an address to the court in order to avoid prosecution on a more serious crime.  I simply stated that on a more serious crime, I might feel differently, but that, in this case, if I were not required to give an address for my fictitious Uncle Smith, I would not hesitate for a moment, especially if his first name were Bill. 

But if I were required to give his address, I might be intimidated into just paying the fine and taking the blame on myself, especially, if he were someone I had a great admiration for.  So the additional requirement stated on the Citation is more intimidating than the law is written for, and the law stipulates that they should use their code for enforcement.

Anyway, the Judge said I made a good case and dismissed it.  He discussed with a clerk, and she told him that LaserCraft designed the form, and they are the ones who put the language in there.  That may explain why the other one on your website, Duluth or Gwinnett also have the same error regarding the penalty code.  That came up too, and the clerk said that that code error has now been corrected by LaserCraft.

Thanks for your help, and I will refer others to your website, particularly for speeding offenses.  I have read through that, and what you have here is very powerful.

Sam S.

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Barbara H
To:
the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER
Sent:
Monday, November 13, 2005 6:17 AM
Subject:
Re: Speeding Ticket Monroe

Had my court date last Thursday in Monroe county. The Trooper didn’t show. The judge dismissed my case. If I hadn’t found your website I probably would have just paid the fine. Saved me $270. It really felt great!

Barbara Hershey

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Phil_Gordin@......
To:
the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER
Sent:
Thursday, December 1, 2005 8:15 AM
Subject:
Re: Red Light Camera

Mr. Waters,

Your not going to believe this, but the mailing date on the envelope on my red light camera citation was 12 days after the alleged violation. I went down to the court and pointed this out and they dismissed my case as you said they would have to. Now what ordinary citizen would have even known to do that? Saved me 70 bucks. Thanks very much as I am a student currently going to Chattahoochee tech and simply couldn’t afford it. I really appreciate your help.

Thanks, Phillip

 

----- Original Message -----

From: jack_gordon@......
To:
the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER
Sent:
Friday, December 23, 2005 9:10 PM
Subject:
My CD Purchase

Just wanted to comment on my CD.

I purchased your CD via PayPal after stumbling across your website, more out of curiosity than anything else as I do not currently have a traffic ticket. 

I was skeptical at first, even after reviewing your table of contents page, but your CD contains an incredible amount of information. I have spent several weeks reviewing it and still have not read everything.

I especially enjoyed the part about learning how to file Freedom of Information Act request letters to government agencies and found especially helpful all the original letters you have previously used to do so and provided as templates on the CD.

To me that was with the price of the CD alone. This is some incredibly powerful information.

JK

 

----- Original Message -----

From: jb_gbstech@......
To:
the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER
Sent:
Sunday, December 25, 2005 1:00 PM
Subject:
Re: My Summons

Sir,

Thank You for your website and all your help. I wanted to follow up with you in detail and tell you about my day in Atlanta municipal court.

Everything happened exactly as you said it would. The Atlanta PD officer that testified in my case stood right in front of the judge and started reading from the ticket. I immediately objected and cited the Georgia code section and Georgia case law that prohibits a witness from testifying by reading directly from a document, but the judge overruled and let him do it anyway. You were right, but it did throw them of track for a moment as you said it would.

They went right thru the entire testimony charade almost word for word just like you described. After the officer finished, I motioned for dismissal and started reading off the items from my Quick Reference Defense sheet. The judge offered to allow the state to reopen, but it was pointless, as they had not even one of the documents.

They also missed testifying to venue as you said they might. But I didn't mention anything about that during the first motion to dismiss as the instruction sheet advises.

They judge hated having too, you could see it pain her face, but she dismissed my case. She was a real arrogant ass I might add. This was the city of atlanta as you might remember from previous emails.

Thanks for all your help. It was great pulling the ambush on them. Everybody before me was found guilty, and not a one of them had a clue as to what to do. You are correct, they are absolutely counting on your ignorance.

If you have any questions about my case please contact me back, and thanks again.

A website and service like yours has long been overdue.

James B.
Marietta, Ga.

 

Copyright ©2004-2010, the Georgia $peedingTICKETKILLER
All Rights Reserved
 

Click on the BUY NOW button to Purchase Your Copy of
the Georgia
$peedingTICKETKILLER CD
via Major Credit Card Today!